The Need to Expand the Space of the Ethiopian Legal System to Accommodate Non-state Law: Exemplifying Non-state Law through the Gada System

Authors

  • Fesseha Fantaye Public Prosecutor, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20372/wjlaw.v2i2.1650

Keywords:

Ethiopian Legal System, Gada System, Non-state law, State Law

Abstract

This article aims to examine the space of the Ethiopian legal system to accommodate non-state law in general and the Gada system in particular. It is an accepted truism that the development method of a given state law determines its space to accommodate non-state law and its efficiency.  The development of non-state law, like law in the Gada system, is evolutionary, while Ethiopia’s legal system has developed through a revolutionary method.  Moreover, a state law that provides good space for non-state law and is developed through an evolutionary method is an efficient than one without fair space for non-state law and developed through a revolutionary method. Scrutinizing the space of the Ethiopian legal system to accommodate non-state law reveals that it has not yet provided justifiable space for non-state law to date. As a result, the researcher, by employing a doctrinal research method, argues that the Ethiopian legal system must be revised in a way that allows state and non-state law will be implemented in a way that complements each other for efficient and effective protection of a common good. 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Fesseha Fantaye, Public Prosecutor, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia

LLB (Jimma University), LLM in Construction Law (OSU - VUA), Public Prosecutor, Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia. The author can be reached at fishju2000@gmail.com    

 

Downloads

Published

2025-06-27

How to Cite

Fantaye, F. (2025). The Need to Expand the Space of the Ethiopian Legal System to Accommodate Non-state Law: Exemplifying Non-state Law through the Gada System. Wallaga University Journal of Law, 2(2), 33–56. https://doi.org/10.20372/wjlaw.v2i2.1650

Plaudit