Editorial Process

The submitted manuscript will be reviewed for possible publication with the understanding that it is being submitted to MHSR Journal that point in time and has not been published anywhere, simultaneously submitted, or already accepted for publication elsewhere. The journal expects them to correspond with the Journal for all matters related to the manuscript. All manuscripts received are duly acknowledged.

Upon submission of the manuscript, editor initially checks for suitability for formal review. Manuscripts with insufficient originality, serious scientific or technical flaws, or lack of a significant message are peer-review.

Manuscripts that are found suitable for publication in MHSR are sent to two or more qualified reviewers who have had experience in the subject of the submitted manuscript. However, the selection of these reviewers is at the sole discretion double-blind review process, wherein the reviewers and authors are unaware of each other’s identity. Every manuscript is finally reviewed by the Editor comments from the reviewers takes a final decision on the manuscript. The comments and suggestions (minor revision/Major revision/ acceptance/ rejection/ amendments in manuscript) conveyed to the corresponding author. If required, the author is requested to provide a point by point response to reviewers’ comments and submit a process is repeated till reviewers and editors are satisfied with the manuscript.

Manuscripts accepted for publication are copy edited for grammar, punctuation, print style, and format. Page proofs are sent to the corresponding expected to return the corrected proofs within three days. It may not be possible to incorporate corrections received after that period. The whole process final decision and sending and receiving proofs is completed online.