Developing Empirical Relationship between Interrill Erosion, Rainfall Intensity, Slope Gradient and Soil Types in Highlands of Salale, Ethiopia
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.4314/star.v5i1.8Keywords:
Interrill erosion, Empirical equations, Erosion modelsAbstract
In order to develop an empirical relationship for interrill erosion based on rainfall intensity, slope steepness and soil types, an interrill erosion experiment was conducted using laboratory rainfall simulator on three soil types (Vertisols, Cambisols and Leptosols) for the highlands of North Shewa Zone of Oromia Region. From simulation work done using 450 x 320 x 100 mm erosion test pan; splashed soils, runoff and washed soils were collected at 5 minute interval for each 15 minutes simulation run at various combinations of design rainfall intensities of 25.67, 52.14, 73.50, and 99.20 mmhr-1, slope steepness of 5, 20, 35, and 50% and the three soil types. Runoff rate, splash and wash loss were measured to obtain a total soil loss from the test pan. Different models relating interrill erosion with rainfall intensity and runoff rate were considered and their coefficients and parameters were estimated. From the models, those with highest prediction potential (R2) were selected to be incorporated into models consisting soil properties and used to form six basic models of which three of them had shown average R2 values of more than 0.95. Accordingly, five slope factor equations were combined with the three selected models and thus 15 models were formed. Out of these models, three of them had shown R2 > 0.90 and were further compared with each other using the graph plotted for observed versus predicted interrill erosion. This showed that model incorporating rainfall intensity, runoff rate, median soil particle diameter, % clay and quadratic form of slope factor carried higher prediction potential than the other two models and selected as the final model for predicting interrill erosion. As this model incorporates more factors than those previously developed models, it ensures more accurate estimation of interrill erosion.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Agarwal, A., Dickinson, W.T. (2005). Effect of texture, rainfall and slope on rainfall interrill sediment transport. Nordic Hydrology 22: 227-242.
Bradford, J.M., Ferris, J.E., Remley, P.A. (1987). Interrill soil erosion processes: Effect of surface sealing on infiltration, runoff, and soil splash detachment to soil properties. Soil Science Society of America Journal 51(6): 1566-1571.
Fan, J.C., Wu, M.F. (2001). Estimation of interrill soil erosion on steep slopes. Transactions of the ASAE 44(6): 1471- 1475.
Fox, D.M., Bryan, R.B. (1999). The relationship of soil loss by rainfall intensity between 1.5 and 30 mm h-1 interrill erosion to slope gradient. Catena 38:211–222.
Gete Z., Hurni, H. (2001). Implications of Land Use and Land Cover dynamics for mountain resource degradation in the northwestern Ethiopian highlands. Mountain Research and Development 21: 184-191.
Goff, B.F., Bent,G.C., Hart, G.E. (2000). Influence of rainfall intensity on interrill erodibility of two rangeland soils. Transactions of the ASAE 37(5): 1442-1447.
Grosh, J.L., Jarrett, A.R. (2004). Interrill erosion and runoff on very steep slopes. Transactions of the ASAE 37(4): 1120–1130.
Huang, C. (2001). Empirical analysis of slope and runoff for sediment delivery from interrill areas. Transactions of the ASAE 59:982–990.
Jayawardena, A.W., Rezaur, R.B. (2006). Modeling interrill sediment delivery. Proceeding of the Seventh International Symposium on River Sedimentation. 16-18 Dec. Hong Kong.
Le Bissonnais, Y. (1996). Soil characteristics and aggregate stability. In: M. Aggassi (ed.). Soil Erosion, Conservation, and Rehabilitation, 41-60. Marcel Dekker. New York.
Le Bissonnais, Y., Singer, M.J. (2003). Seal formation, runoff and interrill erosion for Seventeen California soils. Transactions of the ASAE 57(1): 224 – 230.
Liebenow, A.M., Elliot, W.J., Laflen, J.M., Kohl, K.D. (1990). Interrill erodibility: Collection and analysis of data from cropland soils. Transactions of the ASAE 33(4): 1870- 1899.
McCool, D.K., Brown, L.C., Foster, G.R. (1997). Revised slope steepness factor for the universal Soil Loss Equation. Transactions of the ASAE 30: 1387-1394.
Mengistu B. (2003). Study on the Effect of Slope Steepness and Antecedent Soil Moisture Content on Interrill Erosion. MSc Thesis, Haramaya University, 112p
Meyer, L.D. (1994). Rainfall simulator for soil erosion research. In: R. Lal, (ed.). Soil Erosion Research Methods, 83-91.
SCRP, 1990. Soil loss and runoff assessment findings. Soil conservation research project (SCRP). Addis Abeba, Ethiopia.
Sheridan, G.J., So, H.B., Loch, R.J., Walker, C.M. (2007). Estimation of erosion model erodibility parameters from media properties. Aust. J. Soil Res. 39: 140-187.
Van Liew, M.W., Saxton, K.E. (2006). Slope steepness and incorporated residues effects on interrill erosion. Transactions of the ASAE 26(6):1738-1743.
Zhang, X.C., Nearing, M.A., Miller, W.P., Norton, L.D., West,
L.T. (2003). Modeling Interrill sediment delivery. Soil Science Society of America Journal 62(2): 502-507.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2016 Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © 2023 Copyright; All rights reserved