Desirable System Requirements for Employee Performance Evaluation to Establishment of Meritocracy and Continuous Improvement by using TQMPE and AHP Model
Keywords:
Performance evaluation, Meritocratic system systematic thinking, Training and developmentAbstract
The present work attempts to develop a multidimensional performance evaluation framework of development projects by considering all relevant measures of performance. In order to demonstrate the applicability of this performance evaluation framework, it has considered the case of private and state-owned bank projects constructed between 2010 and 2014 in Iran and collected the viewpoints of 447 respondents. The investigation of performance evaluation is one of the main issues in the human management resource (HRM) and many empirical studies have been concentrated to this field. For this purpose, the main objective of this study is to investigate the staff performance evaluation in private and state-owned banks in Iran by using on TQMPE and AHP models.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Ahmed, I., Sultana, I., Paul, S. K. and Azeem, A. (2013). Employee performance evaluation: a fuzzy approach. International Journal of Productivity and Performance
Bellavance, F., Landry, S. andSchiehll, E. (2013). Procedural justice in managerial performance evaluation: Effects of subjectivity, relationship quality, and voice opportunity. The British Accounting Review 45(3): 149-166.
Carmona, S., Iyer, G. andReckers, P.M.J. (2014). Performance evaluation bias: A comparative study on the role of financial fixation, similarity-to-self and likeability. Advances in Accounting, incorporating. Advances in International Accounting 30(1): 9-17.
Chen, G. andKlimoski, R.J. (2007). Training and development of human resources at work: Is the state of our science strong?. Human Resource Management Review 17(2):180-190.
Garofano, C. and Salas, E. (2005). What influences continuous employee development decisions?. Human Resource Management Review 15(4): 281-304.
Goa, F., Li, M. andNakamori, Y. (2002). System thinking on knowledge and its management: systems methodology for knowledge management. Journal of knowledge management 6(1): 7-17.
Hung, S. W., He, D. S. and Lu, W. M. (2014).Evaluating the dynamic performances of business groups from the carry- over perspective: A case study of Taiwan's semiconductor industry. Omega 46: 1-10.
Kadan, O. and Liu, F. (2014).Performance evaluation with high moments and disaster risk. Journal of Financial Economics 113(1): 131-155.
Ladd, B. S. and Marshall, V. (2004). Participation in decision making: a matter of context?. The Leadership and Organization Development Journal 25(8): 646-662.
Ngacho, C., Das, D. (2014). A performance evaluation framework of development projects: An empirical study of Constituency Development Fund (CDF) construction projects in Kenya. International Journal of Project Management 32(3): 492-507.
Penalvo, F.J.G. and Conde, M. (2014).Using informal learning for business decision making and knowledge management. Journal of Business Research 67(5): 686- 691.
Saad, G.H. (2001). Strategic performance evaluation: descriptive and prescriptive analysis. Industrial Management and Data System 101(8): 390-399.
Slaughter, J.E., Bagger, J. and Li, A. (2006).Context effects on group-based employee selection decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 100(1): 47-59.
Wu, H.Y., Lin, Y.K. and Chang, C.H., (2011).Performance evaluation of extension education centers in universities based on the balanced scorecard. Evaluation and Program Planning 34(1): 37-50.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2014 Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © 2023 Copyright; All rights reserved
