Differential Effects of Post Post-Flowering Flowering Drought Stress on Growth and Yield of the Basic Generations of Two Common Bean (Phaseolus Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)
Keywords:
Common Bean, Drought Indices, Drought Resistance, Seed YieldAbstract
Information on the response of basic generations of a population to drought stress may help in designing effective breeding procedure and identification of selection criteria that can be used to develop suitable cultivars. This study was carried out to ass assess the differential effects of drought stress initiated at flowering stage on the growth, physiological and yield related traits of six basic generations of two common bean populations made of crosses between pairs of drought resistant and susceptible parents par (Roba-1 X SER-16; Melka-Dima X SAB623). On average, the stress imposed reduced the various characters examined in the range of 3% (pod length) to 28% (seed yield). Canopy temperature and chlorophyll content, however, increased in response to the stres stress. When generations of the two populations were compared, those obtained from Melka-Dima Melka X SAB-623 were more sensitive to drought than Roba 1 X SER- -16 counterparts. In both crosses, the drought susceptible parents (Roba 1 and Melka-Dima) Dima) had the highest drought-induced dr reduction in growth, stomatal conductance and all yield related traits whereas P1, F1 and BC1 exhibited better performance under drought stress for the different characters studied. Under drought, F1 generation produced higher seed yield than F2 and the two parents, indicating the presence hetrosis under the stress condition. With geometric means of 3722 and 4077, F1 and P1 were found to be the most drought resistant generations in Roba 1 X SER-16 and Melka-Dima X SAB-623 623 crosses, respectively. respectively Superior performance under drought stress of these generations was associated with the maintenance of higher stomatal conductance, leaf area and aboveground biomass as well as greater ability to remobilize biomass to reproductive sinks (pods and seeds).
Downloads
Metrics
References
Abebe, A., Brick, M.A. and Kirkby, R. (1998). Comparison of selection induces to identify productive dry lines under diverse environmental conditions. Field Crops Research, 58, 15-23.
Acosta, D.E., Acosta-Gallegos, J.A.A. and Padilla,
R.J.S. (2004). Relaciónraíz-vástago en frijol bajo dos condiciones de humedad. Agricultural Science and Técnology in México, 30, 63-73.
Assefa, H. (1994). Epidemiology of bean rust in Ethiopia. Ph.D Thesis. Wageningen University. The Netherlands.
Beebe, S.E., Rao, I.M., Cajiao, C. and Grajales, M. (2008). Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Science, 48, 582-92.
Blum, A. (2005). Drought resistance, water use efficiency, and yield potential are they compatible, dissonant, or mutually exclusive? Australian Journal of Agricultural Research, 56, 1159-1168.
Castaneda-Saucedo, M.C., Cordova-Tellez, L., Gonzalez-Hernandez, V.A., Delgado-Alvardo, A., Santacruz-Varela, A. and Santos, G.G. (2009). Physiological performance, yield, and quality of dry beans under drought conditions. Interciencia, 34(10), 748-754.
Demming-Adams, B. and Adams, W.W. (1996). Xanthophyll cycle and light stress in nature: uniform response to excess direct sunlight among higher plant species. Planta, 198, 460-470.
De Oliveira, A., Fernandes, E.J. and Rodrigues, T.J.D. (2005). Conductanciaestomatica Como Indicador de estressehidricoem Feijao. Engineering in Agriculture Jaboticabal, 25, 86-95.
Emam, Y., Shekoofa, A., Salehi, F and Jalali, A.H. (2010). Water stress effects on two common bean cultivars with contrasting growth habits. American- Eurasian Journal of Agricultural & Environmental Sciences, 9(5), 495-499.
Farshadfar, E., Sabaghpour, S.H. and Khaksar, N. (2008). Inheritance of drought tolerance in chickpea (Cicerarietinum L.) using joint scaling test. Journal of Applied Sciences, 8, 3931-3937.
Fischer, R.A., Rees, D., Sayre, K.D., Lu, Z.M., Condon,
A.G. and Larque Saavedra, A. (1998) .Wheat yield progress associated with higher stomatal conductance and photosynthetic rate and cooler canopies. Crop Science, 38, 467-1475.
Gebeyehu, S., Wiese, H., Schubert, S. (2010). The effects of drought stress on assimilate availability and metabolism in the source and sink organs of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L) genotypes. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science, 20, 47- 63.
Ghassemi-Golezeni, K. and Mardfar, R.A. (2008). Effect of Limited Irrigation on Growth and Grain yield of Common bean. Journal of Plant Sciences, 3(3), 230-235.
Gomez, A.K and Gomez, A.A. (1984). Statistical Procedures for Agricultural Research. 2nd edition. John Wiley and Sons, New York.
Khaghani, S., Bihamta, M.R., Hosseini, S.D., Mohammadi, S.S., Darvish, F. (2012). Genetic analysis of common bean agronomic traits in stress and non-stress conditions. African Journal Agricultural Research, 7(6), 892-901.
Makhdum, M.I., Malik, M.N.A., Din, S.U., Ahmad, F. and Chaudhry, F.I. (2002). Physiological response of cotton to methanol foliar application. Journal of Research (Science), 13, 37-43.
Mitra, J. (2001). Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Current Science, 80, 758-763.
Munir, M., Chowdhry, M.A. and Ahsan, M. (2007). Generation means studies in bread wheat under drought condition. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology, 9(2), 282-286.
Munoz-Perea, C.G., Terán, H. Allen, R.G., Wright, J.L., Westermann, D.T. and Singh, S.P. (2006). Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sciences, 46, 2111- 2120.
Nielsen, D.C and Nelson, N.C. (1998). Black bean sensitivity to water stress at various growth stages. Crop Sciences, 38, 422-427.
Nunez-Barrios, A., Hoogenboom, G. and Nesmith, D.S. (2005). Drought stress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Scientia Agricola, 62,18-22.
Porch, T.G., Ramirez, V.H., Santana, D. and Harmsen,
T. (2009). Evaluation of Common Bean for Drought Tolerance in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. Journal of Agro Crop Science, 195, 328-334.
Rahman, M. A., and Yahata, H. (2007). Effect of Mulch and Irrigation on Leaf water Relation and Pod yield of Common Bean in Dry period of Bangladesh. International Agricultural Research, 2(10), 862-869.
Ramirez-Vallejo, P. and Kelly, J.D. (1998). Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica, 99, 127-136.
Reynolds, M.P. and Trethowan, R.M. (2007). Physiological interventions in breeding for adaptation to abiotic stress. In: Spiertz, J.H.J., Struik, P.C. and Van Laar, H.H (eds.), Scale and Complexity in Plant Systems Research: Gene- Plant-Crop Relations, 129-146.
Rosales-Serna, R., Kohashi-Shibata, J., Acosta- Gallegos, J.A., Trejo-Lopez, C., Ortizcereceres, J. and Kelly, J. (2004). Biomass distribution, Maturity acceleration and yield in Drought- stressed Common bean Cultivars. Field Crops Research, 85, 203-211.
Santos, M.G., Ribeiro, R.V., Machado, E.C. and Pimentel, C. (2009). Photosynthetic parameters and leaf water potential of five common bean genotypes under mild water deficit. Biologia Plantarum, 53(2), 229-236.
Siddique, M.R.B., Hamid, A and Islam, M.S. (2011). Drought stress effects on water relations of wheat. Botanical Bulletin of Academia Sinica 41, 35-39.
Subbarao, G.V., Johansen, C., Slinkhard, A.E., Nageswara Rao, R.C., Saxena, N.P. and Chauhan,
Y.S. (1995). Strategies for improving drought resistance in grain legumes. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 14, 469-523.
Taiz, L. and Zeiger, E. (2006). Plant Physiology. 3rd Ed., Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, pp: 705.
Teran, H. and Singh, S.P. (2002). Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Science, 42, 64-70.
Terzi, R., Saglam, A., Kutlu, N., Nar, H. and Kadioglu,
A. (2010). Impact of soil drought stress on photochemical efficiency of photo system II and antioxidant enzyme activities of Phaseolus vulgaris cultivars. Turkish Journal of Botany, 34, 1-10.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2013 journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © 2023 Copyright; All rights reserved
