Habermas, Modernity and Postmodernism
A Philosophical Inquiry
Keywords:
Modernity, Postmodernism, Deconstruction, Disciplinary powerAbstract
The modern/postmodern debate is usually presented as one of universality vs. relativism, rationalism vs. irrationalism and emancipation vs. deconstruction. This article tries to critically expose and critique Habermas’s discussion of postmodernism as a way of highlighting some of the limitations of this lively discussion. This is to be accomplished through a conceptual analysis of Habermas’s defense of modernity against the postmodernism of Jacques Derrida and Michel Foucault as elaborated in Habermas’s work The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity. Through such an analysis, I will argue for the following points. (1) Habermas’s discourse of modernity provides better accounts of responsibility and emancipation compared to the postmodernism of Derrida and Foucault.
-
Still, Habermas’s discourse of modernity fails to fully address asymmetrical power relations and (3) Habermas’s modernity is Eurocentric in failing to fully deconstruct the Eurocentric tendencies of the philosophical tradition of which it’s a part.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anderson, Walter Truett (1995). The Truth about the truth, de-Confusing and re-instructing the Postmodern World. Jeremy P. Tarcher Putnam Penguin , USA.
Benhabib, Seyla (1997). Habermas and the Unfinished Project of Modernity. The MIT press.USA.
Best, Steven .(2005). The Politics of Historical Vision.
Marx, Foucault, and Habermas, Guilford U.S.A.
Cahoone, Lawrence. (2003) From Modernism to Postmodernism, an Anthology. Blackwell Publishing, U.S.A.
Derrida., Jacques. (1997). Of Grammatology Trans. Gayatri hakravorty Spivak: John Hopkins University Press. U.S.A.
Derrida., Jacques, (2005). Writing and Difference Trans. Alan Bass. Routledge.U.S.A.
Dussel, Enrique (1993) Eurocentrism and Modernity, Introduction to the Frankfurt lectures. Duke university Press 20(3): 65-76.
Dussel., Enrique. (1996). The Underside of Modernity: Apel, Ricoeur, Rorty, Taylor and the Philosophy of Liberation ed. and Trans. Eduardo Mendietta. Humanities Press U.S.A.
Dussel, Enrique (1997) The Architectonic of the Ethics of Liberation on Material Ethics and Formal Moralities. Sage Publications 23( 3): 1-35.
Eze, Emmanuel Chukwudi (1997). Postcolonial African Philosophy, a Critical Reader, Blackwell Publishers, USA.
Finlayson., James Gordon. (2005). Habermas: A very Short Introduction.Oxford University Press. U.S.A.
Foucault., Michel. (1972). History, Discourse and Discontinuity” Trans Anthony M. Nazzaro Salmagundi. No. 20. Pp. 225-248.
Foucault., Michel. (1990). The History of Sexuality volume 1; an introduction. Trans. Robert Hurley vintage books. U.S.A:
Foucault, Michel. (1993). About the Beginning of the Hermeneutics of the Self: Two Lectures at Dartmouth. Sage Publications. 21: 198-227.
Habermas., Jürgen. (1984). The Theory of Communicative Action, Volume One, Reason and the Rationalization of society. Trans-Thomas McCarthy. Beacon Press. U.S.A.
Habermas, Jürgen (1987). The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Twelve Lectures, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Trans Frederick Lawrence, U.S.A.
Matustik, Martin J. (1989) Habermas on Communicative Reason and Performative Contradiction. New German Critique 47:143-172.
Owen David, S. (2002). Between Reason and History: Habermas and the idea of progress. State University of New York Press, U.S.A.
Rabinow and Paul, (1984). The Foucault reader.
Random House inc, USA.
Rorty, Richard-(1984), Habermas and Lyotard on Postmodernity. Praxis International. Vol 4.
Ryan, Michael. (1982) Marxism and Deconstruction, a critical Articulation. The John Hopkins University Press, U.S.A.
Sorensen, Asger, (2009) Enrique Dussel A Critique of Ideology from the South, Roskike University 2(2): 84-101.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2012 journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © 2023 Copyright; All rights reserved
