The Effects of Dynamic Assessment on the Students’ Self-assessment

The Case of Writing Skills

Authors

  • Zerihun Buli Wollega University
  • Zeleke Teshome Wollega University
  • Rufael Disasa Wollega University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v10i2.04

Keywords:

Self-assessment, strengthening, experimental group, dynamic

Abstract

This study examined how dynamic assessment affects grade 11 students' writing self-evaluation. Participants were chosen from existing sections, creating a quasi-experimental design. Students were randomly picked from two grade 11 sections and allocated to control and experimental groups. This study has 97 participants—49 in the control group and 48 in the experimental group. The researcher used a pre-test, post-test, self-rating rubric scale, and individual interview to gather data. After validating parametric test assumptions, mean standard deviation, one-way ANOVA, and regression analysis were used to analyze the data. Qualitative analysis was also employed to support quantitative conclusions with individual interview data. The one-way ANOVA analysis revealed a significant difference in writing performance between experimental group students and their self-assessment levels (p = 0.004). Research indicates that self-assessment accurately predicts writing performance, with a significant t-value at the alpha level of 0.000 (p<.05). Thus, self-assessment levels affect pupils' writing performance. Dynamic assessment is expected in classes to improve students' self-evaluation reliability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Zerihun Buli, Wollega University

Department of English Language and Literature, Wollega University, P.O. Box 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia

Zeleke Teshome, Wollega University

Department of English Language and Literature, Wollega University, P.O. Box 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia

Rufael Disasa, Wollega University

Department of English Language and Literature, Wollega University, P.O. Box 395, Nekemte, Ethiopia

References

Alemi, M. (2015). The impact of dynamic assessment on Iranian EFL students’ writing self-assessment. TELL, 9 (1),

–169.

Aly, N. (2005). The effect of self-assessment as a revision technique on the EFL learners' essay writing (M.A. Thesis), Cairo: University of Cairo

Andrade, H.G., & Boulay, B.A. (2003). Role of rubric-referenced self-assessment in learning to write. The Journal of Educational Research, 97(1), 21–30.

Bachman, L. F. (2000). Modern language testing at the turn of the century. Language Testing, 17(1), 1-42.

Badger, R. & White, G. (2000). A process genre approach to teaching writing. ELT Journal, 54 (2), 153-160.

Baleghizadeh, S. &Hajizadeh, T. (2014). Self and teacher-assessment in an EFL writing class. Gist Education and Learning Research Journal, 8, 99-117.

Besharati, F. (2018). An interactionist dynamic assessment of essay writing via goggle docs: A case of three Iranian EFL university students. IJEAP, 7(1), 96-114.

Cheung, Y. L. (2016). Teaching writing.

W. A. Renandya & H. P. Widodo (Eds.), English language teaching today: Building a closer link between theory and practice. New York, NY: Springer International.

Daneshfar, S., & Moharami, M. (2018). Dynamic assessment in Vygotsky’s socio- cultural theory: origins and main concepts Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 9(3), 600–607.

Farrokh, P., & Rahmani, A. (2017). Dynamic assessment of writing ability in transcendence tasks based on Vygotskian perspective. Asian-Pacific Journal of Second and Foreign Language Education, 2, 1-23.

Feuerstein, R., Y. Rand, & M.B. Hoffman. (1979). The dynamic assessment of retarded performers: The LPAD, theory, instruments, and techniques. Baltimore, MD: University Park Press.

Guthke, J. (1992). Learning tests: The concept, main research findings, problems and trends. In, J.S. Carlson (Ed.), Advances in cognition and educational practice. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

Hinkel, E. (2004).Teaching academic ESL writing: Practical techniques in vocabulary and grammar. Lawrence Earlbaum Associates Inc.

Haywood, H. C., & Lidz, C. S. (2007). Dynamic assessment in practice: Clinical and educational applications. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.

Haywood, H.C. &Tzuriel, D. (Eds.). (1992). Interactive assessment. New York: Springer-Verlag.

Medhanit, B., Meseret, G., & Akililu, G. (2015). Perception and practice of self- assessment in EFL writing classrooms. Journal of Languages and Culture, 6(1), 1-8.

Meihami, H. &Varmaghani, Z. (2013). The implementation of self-assessment in EFL writing classroom. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 9, 39-48.

Lenski, S. D., &Verbruggen, F. (2010). Writing instruction and assessment for English language learners, K-8. New York: Guilford Press.

Lindemann, E. (1995). A rhetoric for writing teachers (3rd edition). New York: OUP.

Lounis, M. (2010). Students’ response to teachers’ feedback on writing.The case of 3rd year L.M.D students of English (MA Thesis), Algeria.

Mahdavi, M. (2014).The effect of dynamic assessment on essay writing ability of Iranian EFL students. Eastern Mediterranean University.

Matsuno, S. (2009). Self, peer, and teacher- assessments in Japanese university EFL writing classrooms. Language Testing, 26(1), 75-100.

Meihami, H., &Varmaghani, Z. (2013). The implementation of self-assessment in EFL writing classroom. International Letters of Social and Humanistic Sciences, 9, 39-48.

Nagao, A. (2018). A genre-based approach to writing instruction in EFL classroom context. Canadian Centre of Science and Education, 11(5), 130-147.

Neff-Lippman, J. (2012). Assessing writing.In, Clark et al. (Eds). Concepts in composition: Theory and practice in the teaching of writing (2nd edition). New York: Routledge. University of Exeter.

Oscarson, A.D. (2009). Self-assessment of writing in learning English as a foreign language: Goteborg Studies in Education Sciences. Sweden.

Poehner, M.E., & Lantolf, J.P. (2005). Dynamic assessment in the language classroom. Language Teaching Research, 9(3), 233-265.

Ross, J. A., Rolheiser, C., & Hogaboam-Gray, A.(1999). Effects of self-evaluation training on narrative writing. Assessing Writing, 6, 107-132.doi: 10.1016/S1075- 2935(99)00003-3

Silva, T. (1990). Second language composition instruction: Developments, issues, and directions in ESL. Second language writing: Research insights for the classroom, 11, 23. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781139524 551.005

Sternberg, R. J. &Grigorenko, E. L. (2002). Dynamic testing: The nature and measurement of learning potential. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wang, Y. H. (2007). The addition of an affect test and self-assessment into ESL writing assessment. Professional Teaching Articles, 20, 1

Wong, K. M., & Mak, P. (2019). Self-assessment in the primary L2 writing classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review, 75(2), 183-196.

Downloads

Published

27.06.2021

How to Cite

Buli, Z., Teshome, Z., & Disasa, R. (2021). The Effects of Dynamic Assessment on the Students’ Self-assessment: The Case of Writing Skills. Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research, 10(2), 40–52. https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v10i2.04

Issue

Section

Original Research

Categories

Plaudit