Students’ Perception and Practice of Writing through Peer-led led Learning (PLL) at Bahir Dar University

Authors

  • Abiy Yigzaw Bahir Dar University

Keywords:

PLTL, Fixed, One-to-five, Peer groups, Peer-led learning

Abstract

This study endeavored to probe into Bahir Dar University (BDU) English majoring students’ perceptions and practice of learning writing through ‘one-to-five’ peer-led organization (called PLTL at BDU). The number of English major students at BDU in the 2013/14 Academic Year was only 19, and all were included in the study. Data were gathered through questionnaire and interview and were analyzed comparing obtained mean against determined expected mean, rank order and narration of the interview responses. The results of the study indicated that participants favored the fixed ‘one-to-five’ peer-led grouping, and witnessed its significance in learning writing. They also esteemed that the tasks and materials they used for practicing writing during peer discussion were of great help to their classroom learning. However, they said that teacher’s support and commitment, peer leaders’ assistance and commitment as well as peer members’ zeal and participation was negligible. It was also found that participants favored teacher-guided learning, tutor-guided learning, collaborative learning through varying groups, individual-based learning, and collaborative learning in fixed groups in that order. The interviewees had also unveiled that teacher’s support and peer-leaders’ capacity and commitment as well as group members’ commitment was far below the expected. Group members also tended to depend on one or two students for all tasks given to groups. Hence, they thought that PLTL had not achieved the objective it was sought to get done. Finally, it was concluded that though students’ favored the fixed, ‘one-to-five’ peer-led organization in learning writing, they practically prioritized teacher-guided learning probably because of the drawbacks they observed, as they reported it in the interview, in the practical implementation of the system. So, it was recommended that teachers, peer leaders and group members should devotedly engage in the system for its effectiveness. It was also recommended that BDU should devise a strategy and guideline that could strictly be followed by the different parties to get the maximum benefit from PLTL; that is, the ‘one-to-five’ group discussion to enhance students’ writing ability.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biography

Abiy Yigzaw, Bahir Dar University

Department of English, Faculty of Humanities, Bahir Dar University, Bahir Dar, Ethiopia

References

BDU, Peer-led Team Learning Implementation Guideline (Unpublished).

Berne, J.I. and Clark, F.C. (2006). Comprehension strategy use during peer-led discussions of text: Ninth graders tackle “The Lottery”. Journal of adolescent and adult literacy 49(8): 674-686.

Bunce, D.A. (2007). Evaluating Peer-Led Team Learning: A Study of Long-Term Effects on Former Workshop Peer Leaders. Journal of Chemical Education 84(3): S35-539.

Curran, E.M., Kerri Carlson., Dayius L. Turvold Celotta (2013). Changing attitudes and facilitating understanding in the undergraduate statistics classroom: A collaborative learning approach. Journal of the Scholarship of Teaching and Learning 13(2): 49-71.

Fernández, M., Rupert Wegerif., Neil Mercer and Sylvia Rojas-Drummond. (2001). Re-conceptualizing “Scaffolding” and the Zone of Proximal development in the Context of Symmetrical Collaborative Learning. Journal of Classroom Interaction 36(2): 40-54.

Flores, B., James Becvar., Ann Darnell., Helmut Knaust., Jorge Lopez., Josefina Tinajero. (2010). Implementing peer led team learning in gateway science and mathematics courses for engineering majors. American Society for Engineering Education.

Hogan, K., Nastasi, B. K. and Pressley, M. (2000). Discourse patterns and collaborative scientific reasoning in peer and teacher-guided discussions. Cognition and Instruction 17(4): 379-432.

Johnson, D. and Johnson, R. (1998). Cooperative learning and social interdependence theory: Cooperative learning. www.co-operation.org/pages/SIT.html*

McMahon, S. and Raphael, T. (1997). The book club connection. New York: Teachers College Press.

Pugazhenthi, C.D. (2013). Writing is an individual activity.

Language in India. 13(6): 827-829.

Rivard, L.P. and S.B. Straw. (2000). The effect of talk and writing on learning science: An exploratory study. Science Education 84: 566-593.

Robertson, E.J. (2005). The effects of learning styles on group development in an online learning environment.

Unpublished MA Thesis, University of North Carolina Wilmington.

Rosenblatt, L.M. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem. Carbondale and Edwardsville, IL: Southern Illinois Press.

Tien, L.T., Roth, V. and Kampmeier, J.A. (2002). Implementation of a Peer-Led Team Learning Instructional Approach in an Undergraduate Organic Chemistry Course. Journal of research in science teaching 39(7): 606-632.

Vygotsky, L. (1978). Interaction between learning and development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Downloads

Published

30.03.2015

How to Cite

Yigzaw, A. (2015). Students’ Perception and Practice of Writing through Peer-led led Learning (PLL) at Bahir Dar University. Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research, 4(1), 197–202. Retrieved from https://journals.wgu.edu.et/index.php/star/article/view/181

Issue

Section

Original Research

Categories

Plaudit