The Influence of Gender on Oral Communication Strategy Preferences: A Focus on First-Year University Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.20372/star.V15.i1.07Keywords:
Gender, Influence, Oral Communication, Oral Communication Strategies, PreferencesAbstract
Oral interaction techniques play a decisive part in bridging communication breakdowns. The motivation for this study arose from our recognition of a lack of clarity regarding male and female students' oral communication strategy preferences among first-year university students during our experience of teaching communicative English skills at Ethiopian universities. The study intended to examine the influence of gender on preferences for oral communication strategies. First-year students from two universities, Wolkite and Wachemo, were selected as participants in the study. One hundred and twenty-five (70 male and 55 female) students were randomly selected to collect quantitative data, and seventeen (ten male and seven female) were purposively selected to gather qualitative data from the first-year batch of the 2024/25 academic year. A descriptive-comparative framework within a convergent-parallel mixed-method design guided the study. The raw data were gathered through questionnaires, observations, and interviews. SPSS version 27 and thematic analysis were used to analyze quantitative and qualitative data, respectively. The findings indicated that gender slightly influences the learners' oral communication strategy preferences. The study recommends that gender-based oral communication strategies should be identified and included in the communicative English skills courses to address gender-related gaps in communication strategies and enhance message delivery.
Downloads
References
Antonello, M. (2023). Defining communication strategies in contemporary discourse studies. International Journal of Communication and Linguistics, 11(2), 45–59.
https://doi.org/10.0000/ijcl.2023.004
Arfin, R.A., Ridwan, R.N., & Kulsum, E.M. (2025). Navigating challenges: Students' strategies for overcoming English speaking difficulties. Journal on Education, 7(2), 8292.
https://doi.org/10.31004/joe.v7i2.8292
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2021). One size fits all? What counts as quality practice in (reflexive) thematic analysis? Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 328–352.
https://doi.org/10.1080/14780887.2020.1769238
Dinsa, M.T. Woldemariam, G.S., & Dagne, D.T. (2022). The influence of gender and study duration on EFL learners' speaking strategies use. International Journal of Language Education, 6(1), 10–24.
https://doi.org/10.26858/ijole.v6i1.19272
Enworo, O.C. (2023). Application of Guba and Lincoln's parallel criteria to assess trustworthiness of qualitative research on indigenous social protection systems. Qualitative Research Journal, 23(4), 372-384
https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-08-2022-0116
Haile, K. W., Olamo, T. G., & Yemiru, M. A. (2024). Utilizing communication strategies to enhance reflective learning in Ethiopian EFL classrooms. Heliyon, 10(13), e32585. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32585
Irsyad, F.N., & Ratmanida, R.(2022). ELT students' communication strategy on speaking performance defined by gender in Universitas Negeri Padang. In Proceedings of the 67th TEFLIN International Virtual Conference & the 9th ICOELT 2021(pp 81–84). Atlantis Press. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.220201.014
Khan, A., Naqvi, S., & Mathew, P. (2023). Influence of task-type and proficiency on communication strategies used by Omani EFL learners. Journal of Teaching English for Specific and Academic Purposes, 11(3), 737–752.
https://doi.org/10.22190/JTESAP231011055K
Loureiro, M., Loureiro, N., & Silva, R. (2020). Differences of gender in oral and written communication apprehension of university students. Education sciences, 10(12), 1-20
https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10120379
Mao, T. (2023). Research on communicative strategies in second language acquisition. Journal of Education and Educational Research, 5(3),13-15.
https://doi.org/10.54097/jeer.v5i3.13063
Mistar, J., & Umamah, A. (2014). Strategies of learning speaking skills by Indonesian learners of English and their contribution to speaking proficiency. TEFLIN Journal, 25(2), 203–216. https://doi.org/10.15639/teflinjournal.v25i2/203-216
Nakatani, Y. (2006). Developing an oral communication strategy inventory. Language Learning,56(2), 151–190.
https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2006.003 90.x
Oxford, R. L. (2011). Strategies for learning a second or foreign language. Language Teaching, 44(2), 167–180.
https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444810000492
Sato, M., & Ballinger, S. (Eds.). (2016). Peer interaction and second language learning: Pedagogical potential and research agenda. Jhon Benjamins.1, 1-30
https://doi.org/10.1075/lllt.45?locatt=mode:legacy
Su, Y. (2025). Balancing human and AI: Exploring the role of Deep Seek in high school oral English teaching. Communications in Humanities Research, 89, 1–7.
https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2025.KM 284 60
Tasisa, M., & Teshome, E. (2025). Gender differences in EFL speaking anxiety: A study in Ethiopian higher education. Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research, 14(3), 65–80.
https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v14.i3.06
Wahyuni, L. G. E. (2023). The Employment of EFL English Teachers' Reflective Teaching: Types and Tools for Assessing Oneself. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Pengembangan Pendidikan, 7(1), 67–78. https://doi.org/10.23887/jpp p.v7i1.59460
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © Copyright; All rights reserved
