School Based CPD and Its Impacts on Teachers’ Practices and Students’ Learning in Some Selected Secondary Schools of East Wollega Zone
Keywords:
Continuous Professional development, school – based CPD, Reflection, evaluation, challengesAbstract
The purposes of this research was to investigate the impacts of school -based professional development on teachers practice and students’ learning, evaluation mechanisms used by secondary schools and assessed the challenges of school based continuous professional development. A mixed research approach that employed instruments of data collection like survey questionnaire that were filled in by teachers, semi-structured interview with school directors and CPD coordinators and document review were used. The findings of the study revealed that all secondary school teachers and department heads developed the culture of engaging in school – based professional development. The impacts of CPD in improving classroom activities, and enhancing the quality of teaching and learning was found to be sufficient in all case study institutions but the impacts of CPD in changing teachers’ subject matter knowledge was low . As compared to the subject related contents, contents which could sharpen their pedagogical skill was sufficient and CPD contents that deepen teachers subject matter knowledge such as individual study , in school trainings ,networking ,and experience sharing with other school teachers , shadowing an experienced teachers and peer observation were very low. With regard to reflection of CPD activities, even though the national CPD framework put evaluation as an important aspect of the CPD cycle, no one considered as a critical issue in the process of school CPD cycle. According to the believe of the KIs , in all sample secondary schools, the only way to monitor and evaluate the practices of individual teachers’ CPD were teachers’ written report which has been made in every month or week .The major factors that influenced the implementation of the school – based CPD were the attention given to CPD from the government , the attitude of teachers towards school-based CPD and the burden that CPD has on teachers and school directors were the most serious problems observed in studied preparatory schools .Timely evaluation of CPD outcomes by the school and lack of professional support from the concerned bodies were also identified as a major factors. In order to implement effectively school based continuous professional development in secondary schools , school directors, department heads, CPD coordinators and teachers should take in to account the national CPD frame work and subject matter content when they prioritize school, department and individual CPD . Secondary school Principals and CPD coordinators have to prepare the school CPD plan with the participation of teachers and department heads in the selection of the school CPD priorities. This condition helps teachers adapt to the plan and use it to include their needs and demands as well as the existing challenges of the schools. This increases mutual responsibility of the school based CPD stakeholders to implement the program.
Downloads
Metrics
References
Anderson, S.E. (Ed). (2002). School improvement through teacher development. Lisse, The Netherlands.
Borko, H. (2004). Professional development and teacher learning: Mapping the terrain. Educational Researcher, 33, 3-15.
Borko, H. & Putnam, R. T. (1995). Expanding teacher’s knowledge base: A cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In, T. R. Guskey & A. M.
Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education (pp.35-65). New York: Teachers College Press.
Buczynski, S., & Hansen, C. B. (2010). Impact of professional development on teacher practice: Uncovering connection. Teacher and Teacher Education, 26, 599-607.
Bolam, R. (2000). Emerging policy trends: some implications for continuing professional development. Journal of In-service Education, 26(2), 267-280.
Clarke, D. & Hollingsworth, H. (2002) Elaborating a model of teacher professional growth.
Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(8), 947-
Cordingley, P. (2005a). The impact of collaborative continuing professional development (CPD) on classroom teaching and learning. Review: In Research Evidence in Education Library. London: EPPI-Centre, Social Science Research Unit.
Creswell, J.W. (2009). Mapping the Field of Mixed Methods Research. Journal of Mixed Methods Research, 3, 95-108.
Denzin, N.K., & Lincoln, Y.S. (Eds). (1998). Collecting and interpreting qualitative materials. Thousand Oaks: Sage
Day, C. (1999). Professional development and reflective practice: purposes, processes and partnerships. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 7, 221 –233.
Desimone, L.M. (2009). Improving Impact Studies of Teachers’ Professional Development: Toward Better Conceptualizations and Measures. Educational Researcher, 38(3), 181-199.
Edmonds, S. & Lee, B. (2002). Teacher feelings about continuing professional development. Education Journal, 61, 28-29.
Fullan, M. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. Newyork: Teachers college press.
Gabriel, R., Day, J. P., & Allington, R. (2011). Exemplary teacher voices on their own development. Phi Delta Kappan, 92, 37-41.
Guskey, T. R. (2000). Evaluating professional development. Thousand Oaks, Ca: Corwin Press.
Guskey, TR, (1995a). Professional development in education: a new paradigm and practice. Newyork: Teachers college press.
Hakim, C (1982). Secondary Analysis in Social Research. London: Allen & Unwin.
Hargreaves, A., & Evans, R. (1997). Teachers and educational reform. In: A. Hargreaves & R. Evans (Eds.). Beyond educational reform: Bringing teachers back (pp.1-18). Buckingham: Open University Press.
Harris, J., Cale, L., & Musson, H. (2010).The effects of a professional development program on primary school teachers’ perceptions of physical education. Professional Development in Education, 37, 291-305.
Hopkins, D. & Harris, A. (2000). Creating the conditions for teaching and learning: a handbook of staff development activities. London: David Fulton Press.
Hoyle, E. (1995). Teachers as professionals. In, Anderson, L. (Ed.), International encyclopedia of teaching and teacher education (2nd edition). London: Pergamum press.
Kwakman, K. (2003). Factors affecting teachers’ participation in professional learning activities. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 149-170.
Lee, H. (2005). Developing professional development program model based on researchers need. The professional Educator, 27(2), 39- 49.
MoE. (2007). Provisional report of CPD action plan 2008-2010. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
MoE. (2004). Continuous professional development (cpd) course one: professional ethics, counseling and mentoring using active learning methodology. MoE: Addis Ababa.
MoE. (2009a). Continuous professional development for primary and secondary teachers, leaders and supervisors in Ethiopia: The practical toolkit. MoE: Addis Ababa.
MoE. (2009b). continuous professional development for primary and secondary school teachers, leaders and supervisors in Ethiopia: The Framework. MoE: Addis Ababa.
Powell, E., Terrell, I., Furey, S., & Scott-Evans, A. (2003). Teachers’ perceptions of the impact of CPD: an institutional case study. Journal of In- service Education, 29, 389-404.
Putnam ,T, & Borko, H. ( 2000) .What do new views of knowledge and thinking have to say about research on teachers learn .Educational Research. American Educational Research association , 29 (1) , 4-15 .
Richardson, V. & Placier, P. (2001) Teacher change, in V. Richardson (Ed.). Handbook of research on teaching (4th Edition). Washington: American Educational Research Association.
Schön, D. (1983). Educating the reflective practitioner: toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. New York: Basic Books.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
STAR © 2023 Copyright; All rights reserved