Teachers’ Conceptions, Practices and Challenges of Assessment for Learning in Secondary Schools of East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State

Authors

  • Assefa Degebas Wollega University
  • Begna Ordofa Wollega University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v8i4.04

Keywords:

Assessment for learning, Continuous assessment, Formative assessment

Abstract

This study was conducted to investigate secondary school teachers’ conceptions, practices, and challenges of assessment for learning in East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State, using a concurrent research design. After clustering 18 districts of East Wollega Zone into four areas, eight secondary schools were selected by a simple random sampling technique. Then, 202 teachers, 4 principals, and 8 department heads were selected from the sample schools by a simple random sampling technique. After the data was collected using interviews and questionnaires, quantitative analysis was made using descriptive statistics, while theme analysis was used for qualitative data. The result revealed that teachers perceive assessment as important for learning as it develops confidence and accountability for students’ learning and improves low achievers' performance. However, task-based activities were not included in the assessment technique, and slow learners earn high marks in group assignments. Few teachers make their students recognise unethical acts like being dependent, copying assignments from one another, and cheating on the exam. Large class sizes, shortage of time, and teacher load were seen as major challenges to implementing assessment for learning. Finally, it was recommended that teachers prepare different assessment techniques that involve students to become more active in their learning and improve their performance. Furthermore, training has to be facilitated by Zonal Education Bureaus with the consultation of Wollega University's College of Education and Behavioural Science for secondary school teachers on how to investigate students’ problems, give focused, timely feedback, measure students’ learning outcomes, and manage a large class size.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Author Biographies

Assefa Degebas , Wollega University

Department of Behavioral Sciences Wollega University, P.O. Nekemte Ethiopia

Begna Ordofa , Wollega University

Department of Behavioral Sciences Wollega University, P.O. Nekemte Ethiopia

References

manual for primary and secondary school teachers. NEAEA, Addis Ababa.

Bennett, J. (2017). Assessment for learning vs. assessment of learning. (https://www. pearsonassessments.com/professional- assessments/blog-webinars/blog). Accessed on February 8, 2020.

Black, P., & Wiliam, D. 1998. Inside the black box: Raising standards through classroom assessment. Phi Delta Kappan, 80 (2), 139–148.

Berry, R. (2008). Assessment for learning. Hong Kong: Hong Kong University Press.

Birhanu, Moges. (2013). Continuous assessment issues and practices in Secondary Schools of Oromia Regional State, Ethiopia: THE “BIG PICTURE” of assessment mechanism. Palgo Journal of Education Research, 1 (1), 19-41,

Brown, G.T.L. (2002). Teacher conceptions of assessment. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

Carless, D. (2005). Prospects for the implementation of assessment for learning. Assessment in Education, 12 (1), 39–54.

CERI (Centre for Educational Research and Innovation). (2008). Assessment for Learning Formative Assessment. 21st Century Learning and Teaching: Innovative Learning Environments. (https://www.oecd.org/site/educeri21st/40600533. pdf). Accessed on June10, 2018.

Creswell, J., & Plano, Clark, V. (2007). Designing and conducting mixed methods research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage

Dayal, H. C. & Lingam, G. I. 2015. Fijian teachers' conceptions of assessment. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 40 (8), 43-58.

Desalegn, Chalsisa. (2014). Practices of assessing graduate students‟ learning outcomes in Selected Ethiopian higher education institutions. Journal of International Cooperation in Education, 16 (2), 157 -180.

Jones, C.A. (2005). Assessment for learning. Learning and skills development agency. Published by the learning and skills development agency.WWW.LSDA.org.uk

Linquanti, R. (2014). Supporting formative assessment for deeper learning: a primer for policymakers. https://www.wested.org/resources/formativea ssessmentprimer/Accessed on October16. 2019

Okas. (n.d). Assessment of learning, for learning, and as learning. http://www.colorado. edu/osaa/sites/default/files/attached- files/AssessmentForOfAsLearning2003_LEarl.pdf Accessed on January 2, 2018.

Oxford University Department of Education. (2013). Assessment for learning: Effects and impact.

CFBT.files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED546817.pd f (Accessed on February 12, 2018).

National Science Teachers Association (NSTA). (2003). Learning through assessment: Assessment for learning in the science classroom. Arlington, Viginia: NSTA Press

Mabry, L., Poole, J., Redmond, L., & Schultz, A. (2003). Local impact of state testing in southwest Washington. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 11(22), 1-35

MoE ( Minister of Education). (2006). Decentralized management of education in Ethiopia. A reference manual. Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, Ged Printing and Packaging Plant.

MoE . (2015). Education Sector Development Programme V (ESDP V): 2008 - 2012 E.C.

/16 - 2019/20 G.C. Addis Ababa.

Morgan, C., & Watson, A. (2002). The interpretive nature of teachers‟ assessment of students‟ mathematics: Issues for equity. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 33(2), 78–90.

Ras, E., Whitelock, D. & Kalz, M. (n.d.). The promise and potential of E- assessment for learning. https://www.taylorfrancis.com/books/e (Accessed on November 26, 2018).

Scriven, M. (1967). The methodology of evaluation: In: Tyler, R., Gagné, R. & Scriven, M. (Eds.), Perspectives of Curriculum Evaluation, 1(1), 39-83

Swaffield, S. (2011). Getting to the heart of authentic assessment for learning. Principles, Policy and Practice, 18 (4), 433–449.

Sintayehu, Belay Abejehu. (2016). The practice of continuous assessment in Primary Schools: The Case of Chagni, Ethiopia. Journal of Education and Practice, 7(31), 1-7.

Thompson, A. G. (1992). Teachers‟ beliefs and conceptions: A synthesis of the research. In:

D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 127- 146), New York: MacMillan.

Torrance, H. & Pryor, J. (2001). Developing formative assessment in the classroom: Using action research to explore and modify theory. British Educational Research Journal, 27 (5), 615–631.

USAID (Unit States Agency for International Development). (2003). Educational Quality in the Developing World. EQ Review, 1(1), 1-3.

Downloads

Published

26.12.2019

How to Cite

Degebas , A., & Ordofa , B. (2019). Teachers’ Conceptions, Practices and Challenges of Assessment for Learning in Secondary Schools of East Wollega Zone, Oromia Regional State. Journal of Science, Technology and Arts Research, 8(4), 43–58. https://doi.org/10.20372/star.v8i4.04

Issue

Section

Original Research

Categories

Plaudit

Most read articles by the same author(s)